Head-to-Head Pricing Benchmark
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Side-by-side pricing and context window comparison for production model selection.
Default Recommendation (120M input + 60M output)
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is lower-cost for the default monthly workload scenario.
Adjust the workload in the calculator below to see a live recommendation for your usage.
| Metric | Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | baidu | |
| Context Window | 123,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output Tokens | 12,000 | 8,192 |
| Input Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.2800 | $0.0750 |
| Output Cost / 1M Tokens | $1.10 | $0.3000 |
| Projected Monthly Cost | $100 | $27 |
| Vision | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Tool Calling | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Structured Output | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Reasoning | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Web Search | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Audio Price / 1M | N/A | $0.0750 |
| Tokenizer | Other | Gemini |
| MMLU Score | 77.6★ | 72.4 |
| GPQA | 81.1★ | 53.5 |
Price History
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Pricing Trend
Current Input / 1M
$0.2800
Current Output / 1M
$1.10
Price History
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Pricing Trend
Current Input / 1M
$0.0750
Current Output / 1M
$0.3000
Cost Calculator
Adjust your workload to see projected monthly costs.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
$100
per month
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
$27
per month
Lower costLive Recommendation
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is lower-cost at 120M input + 60M output tokens/month.
Compare More Alternatives
Continue evaluation with more “A vs B pricing” decision pages.
Quick Compare
Compare Any Two Models
Select two models to see a head-to-head pricing breakdown.