Which is cheaper for input tokens: Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B?
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper or equal on input token cost by $0.01 per 1M tokens.
Head-to-Head Pricing Benchmark
Side-by-side pricing and context window comparison for production model selection.
Default Recommendation (120M input + 60M output)
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B is lower-cost for the default monthly workload scenario.
Adjust the workload in the calculator below to see a live recommendation for your usage.
| Metric | Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | baidu | deepseek |
| Context Window | 123,000 | 32,768 |
| Input Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.2800 | $0.2900 |
| Output Cost / 1M Tokens | $1.10 | $0.2900 |
| Projected Monthly Cost | $100 | $52 |
| Vision | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Tool Calling | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Structured Output | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Reasoning | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| MMLU Score | 77.6 | 73.9 |
| GPQA | 81.1 | 61.5 |
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.2800
Current Output / 1M
$1.10
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.2900
Current Output / 1M
$0.2900
Adjust your workload to see projected monthly costs.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
$100
per month
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B
$52
per month
Lower costLive Recommendation
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B is lower-cost at 120M input + 60M output tokens/month.
Continue evaluation with more “A vs B pricing” decision pages.
Quick Compare
Select two models to see a head-to-head pricing breakdown.
Common questions for Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B pricing decisions.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper or equal on input token cost by $0.01 per 1M tokens.
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper on output token cost by $0.81 per 1M tokens.
$47 difference for the default scenario (120M input + 60M output tokens/month).
Use this page to compare context window and token pricing, then open each model page to evaluate additional alternatives and monthly workload fit.