Which is cheaper for input tokens: Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper on input token cost by $0.02 per 1M tokens.
Head-to-Head Pricing Benchmark
Side-by-side pricing and context window comparison for production model selection.
Default Recommendation (120M input + 60M output)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is lower-cost for the default monthly workload scenario.
Adjust the workload in the calculator below to see a live recommendation for your usage.
| Metric | Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | baidu | deepseek |
| Context Window | 123,000 | 163,840 |
| Input Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.4200 | $0.4000 |
| Output Cost / 1M Tokens | $1.25 | $1.20 |
| Projected Monthly Cost | $125 | $120 |
| Vision | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Tool Calling | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Structured Output | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Reasoning | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| MMLU Score | N/A | 86.3 |
| GPQA | N/A | 87.1 |
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.4200
Current Output / 1M
$1.25
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.4000
Current Output / 1M
$1.20
Adjust your workload to see projected monthly costs.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
$125
per month
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
$120
per month
Lower costLive Recommendation
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is lower-cost at 120M input + 60M output tokens/month.
Continue evaluation with more “A vs B pricing” decision pages.
Quick Compare
Select two models to see a head-to-head pricing breakdown.
Common questions for Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale pricing decisions.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper on input token cost by $0.02 per 1M tokens.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper on output token cost by $0.05 per 1M tokens.
$5.40 difference for the default scenario (120M input + 60M output tokens/month).
Use this page to compare context window and token pricing, then open each model page to evaluate additional alternatives and monthly workload fit.