Which is cheaper for input tokens: Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B or Tencent: Hunyuan A13B Instruct?
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is cheaper or equal on input token cost by $0.00 per 1M tokens.
Head-to-Head Pricing Benchmark
Side-by-side pricing and context window comparison for production model selection.
Default Recommendation (120M input + 60M output)
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is lower-cost for the default monthly workload scenario.
Adjust the workload in the calculator below to see a live recommendation for your usage.
| Metric | Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | Tencent: Hunyuan A13B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | baidu | tencent |
| Context Window | 30,000 | 131,072 |
| Input Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.1400 | $0.1400 |
| Output Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.5600 | $0.5700 |
| Projected Monthly Cost | $50 | $51 |
| Vision | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Tool Calling | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Structured Output | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Reasoning | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| MMLU Score | N/A | N/A |
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.1400
Current Output / 1M
$0.5600
Price History
Current Input / 1M
$0.1400
Current Output / 1M
$0.5700
Adjust your workload to see projected monthly costs.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
$50
per month
Lower costTencent: Hunyuan A13B Instruct
$51
per month
Live Recommendation
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is lower-cost at 120M input + 60M output tokens/month.
Continue evaluation with more “A vs B pricing” decision pages.
Quick Compare
Select two models to see a head-to-head pricing breakdown.
Common questions for Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs Tencent: Hunyuan A13B Instruct pricing decisions.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is cheaper or equal on input token cost by $0.00 per 1M tokens.
Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is cheaper or equal on output token cost by $0.01 per 1M tokens.
$0.60 difference for the default scenario (120M input + 60M output tokens/month).
Use this page to compare context window and token pricing, then open each model page to evaluate additional alternatives and monthly workload fit.